Ratings

Moderators: caedmon, Greg

User avatar
caedmon
Balku'npâ
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:30 am
Location: Palmer Alaska

Ratings

Postby caedmon » Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:09 pm

I'm working more on Ratings, I'm thinking of this for historical:



* * * * * = based on an extant historical object used by Rangers, foresters or huntmen

* * * * = based on an extant historical object -- or -- reasonable conjecture using historical methods that can be documented to be used by Rangers, foresters or huntmen

* * * = reasonable conjecture using historical methods

* * = yup kinda looks like it

* = fur bikini
-Jack Horner

----------------------------
Impression: Boater Wesman ( Balku'npâ Adúnerama ) bronze founder living in Archet, Breelander of mixed dúnedain descent. c. 3017
User avatar
caedmon
Balku'npâ
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:30 am
Location: Palmer Alaska

Re: Ratings

Postby caedmon » Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:18 pm

I'm thinking of something like this for Tolkien based:


* * * * * = directly attributable to something in the books or Tolkien's letters (e.g. Rohirrim armour based on Bayeux Tapestry)

* * * * = reasonable extrapolation from the books (items that are not really in the books but fit, like short swords in the woods)

* * * = It's not ruled out by the books... (Seaxes anyone?)

* * = Yeah, I did it my way.

* = fur bikini
-Jack Horner

----------------------------
Impression: Boater Wesman ( Balku'npâ Adúnerama ) bronze founder living in Archet, Breelander of mixed dúnedain descent. c. 3017
User avatar
Greg
Urush bithî 'nKi ya-nam bawâb
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Up the Greenway; Southern Indiana

Re: Ratings

Postby Greg » Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:58 am

If fur bikini remains the description for "*" across the board, I'm happy.

Though, I must be stingy and point out that we should re-describe the four-star Tolkien rating, as Isildur himself was told as wearing an "Eket", described as "...a short stabbing sword with a broad blade, pointed and two-edged, from a foot to one and a half feet long." Unless, of course, you're referring to arming swords, but I don't think you are since we seem to agree pretty well on the descriptions of Anduril. Just a thought.
Now the sword shall come from under the cloak.
User avatar
Eledhwen
Thangailhir
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Nandaromar, Rhovanion
Contact:

Re: Ratings

Postby Eledhwen » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:54 am

Agree with Greg on the four star rating. Short swords, aka Ekat, are in the books although they appear to be from before or during the collapse of the North Kingdom since I do not recall any description of them in the LotRs or Hobbit..unless the comparison of sting of 'as good as a shortsword for a hobbit' is counted.

Otherwise, fine.

Eledhwen
Nandalad!
User avatar
Greg
Urush bithî 'nKi ya-nam bawâb
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Up the Greenway; Southern Indiana

Re: Ratings

Postby Greg » Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:45 pm

I'd tend towards thinking an eket was longer than sting by a bit. I think Sting was referenced as a large dagger by men's standards, so the eket would wind up a bit larger than that, like your Gladius conversion project you talked about awhile ago.

My view of an eket is now forever slightly tweaked (in a good way) by Ken's description of it in the tales of Daffodil Underhill at the inn talking with a Ranger, so that I nearly referenced that here before remembering that the good professor didn't actually write that tale.
Now the sword shall come from under the cloak.
User avatar
Eledhwen
Thangailhir
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Nandaromar, Rhovanion
Contact:

Re: Ratings

Postby Eledhwen » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:09 pm

I was using the wording of sting to point out that shortswords were known in the Third Age, not comparing an Ekat to Sting. I see an Ekat as closer to a Gladius than anything else.

Eledhwen
Nandalad!

Return to “MER Websites Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest